Categories
Tags
Newsletter
Subscribe to the QRP International neswletter and get all the news on trends, useful contents and invitations to our upcoming events
SubscribeProject estimation is a fundamental aspect of successful project management. It guides resource allocation, sets realistic expectations, and serves as a foundation for planning, scheduling and budgeting. By mastering project estimation techniques, businesses can ensure that all stakeholders, ranging from the project team to external decision-makers, have a clear understanding of what the project entails, its potential risks, and the resources required to succeed.
In this article, we will explore the major components of project estimation and the top techniques for estimation to ensure accurate and actionable forecasts.
Accurate project estimation is critical for defining the parameters that shape a project’s trajectory. These parameters include:
By addressing these components, project estimation enables:
The estimation process involves contributions not only from the project manager but also from specialists and team members. Their insights lead to more accurate forecasts by identifying potential risks and opportunities that might not show immediately.
In the early stages of a project, when detailed information is scarce, ballpark estimates provide a high-level approximation of the effort, time, and cost required. These initial estimates are based on broad assumptions and serve as a starting point for discussions and planning.
While not precise, ballpark estimates are invaluable for setting initial expectations, facilitating resource allocation and guiding stakeholders in understanding the scope of the project. As more data becomes available, these estimates can be refined for greater accuracy.
Expert judgment relies on the insights of specialists, whether internal team members or external consultants. This technique is particularly valuable when there is limited historical data or when navigating complex projects. Experts can also help identify hidden risks or challenges that would not appear from data analysis.
Example: A construction company consults a senior architect to estimate the time and cost required to build a new office complex. Based on their experience with similar projects, the architect identifies potential risks, such as delays due to seasonal weather, and provides an initial estimate.
Analogous estimation rate uses historical data from similar projects to forecast effort, cost, and time. This approach is quick and straightforward but must account for differences between past and current projects for greater accuracy.
Example: A software company needs to develop an e-commerce app. The project manager refers to a similar app the company built last year, which took 1,000 hours and required €50,000. Adjustments are made for new features in the current project, and the estimate is updated accordingly.
Three-point estimation, also known as PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) evaluates the optimistic, pessimistic and most likely outcomes to create an average estimate. This approach accounts for variability and uncertainty in project parameters.
Example: A marketing agency estimates the time to design a new website.
The PERT distribution is calculated with the formula: “Optimistic+(4×Most Likely)+Pessimistic)÷6”. In our example, it can be determined that 4 weeks is the estimated timeline of the project.
Top-down estimation starts with a high-level overview of the project and progressively refines estimates for each component. This method is efficient and relies on the company’s internal knowledge, industry benchmarks and expert opinions to provide an estimate.
Example: A start-up is planning an annual conference. Based on industry benchmarks and past events, the estimated cost for organizing the conference is €100,000. The team breaks this down into major categories (e.g., venue, catering, marketing) and allocates specific budgets to each category for refinement.
This comprehensive approach involves estimating smaller work packages and then aggregating them to determine the overall project estimate. Although time-consuming, this method is highly detailed and accurate, making it ideal for complex projects.
Example: For the same conference, the organisers estimate costs at a detailed level. They determine the cost of renting the venue (€20,000), hiring a caterer (€30,000), and marketing expenses (€10,000). After obtaining the sum of these detailed estimates, they arrive at a total cost of €100,000.
No single solution fits all. Using a combination of methods, such as expert judgment, analogous estimation and bottom-up analysis, allows project managers to account for diverse variables and minimise estimation errors.
Combining techniques ensures a more holistic view of the project’s requirements and increases confidence in the estimates provided. For example, initial analogous estimates can be refined with detailed bottom-up calculations as more data becomes available.
Mastering project estimation is both an art and a science. By combining multiple techniques and following best practices like using multiple methods, project managers can create realistic and actionable plans.
Effective project estimation not only sets the stage for success but also fosters trust among stakeholders by aligning expectations and preparing for the challenges ahead. By adopting these techniques, organisations can turn uncertainty into opportunity and ensure their projects are delivered on time, within scope, and on budget.
At QRP, we support you in achieving professional excellence through worldwide recognised accreditations. Discover our catalogue of Best Practice courses in Project Management and improve the success rate of your projects! Visit our website or contact us!